EXPLORING THE CULTURAL ASPECTS OF ALLITERATION IN ENGLISH AND RUSSIAN LINGUISTICS
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article discusses the cultural significance of alliteration in English and Russian literature, highlighting several contrasting aspects to consider. The author examines linguistic differences, historical contexts, cultural associations, literary traditions, and cultural values to provide a comprehensive understanding of how alliteration is perceived and utilized in each language. By exploring these contrasting aspects, the article aims to deepen readers' appreciation of the cultural significance of alliteration in both English and Russian literature.
Article Details
References
Anderson, C. R., Bullock, E. C., Cross, B., & Powell, A. (2017). Culturally relevant pedagogy and teacher professional development in an urban laboratory for school reform. Teachers College Record, 119(1), 1—34. [Web of Science ®],
Appel, M., & Kronberger, N. (2012). Stereotypes and the achievement gap: Stereotype threat prior to test taking. Educational Psychological Review, 24, 609– 635. doi:10.1007/s10648-012-9200-4 [Crossref], [Web of Science ®],
Banks, J. A. (2004). Teaching for social justice, diversity, and citizenship in a global world. The Educational Forum, 68(4), 296–305. doi:10.1080/00131720408984645 [Taylor & Francis Online], [Google Scholar]
Benczes, R. (2013). The role of alliteration and rhyme in novel metaphorical and metonymical compounds. Metaphor and Symbol, 28, 167—184. doi:10.1080/10926488.2013.797728 [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®],
Brown, K. E., & Medway, F. J. (2007). School climate and teacher beliefs in a school effectively serving poor South Carolina African American student. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 529–540. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2006.11.002 [Crossref], [Web of Science ®],
Brown-Jeffy, S., & Cooper, J. E. (2011). Toward a conceptual framework of culturally relevant pedagogy: An overview of the conceptual and theoretical literature. Teacher Education Quarterly, 38(1), 65–84.
Bullough, R. V., Jr. (1994). Personal history and teaching metaphors: A self study of teaching as conversation. Teacher Education Quarterly, 21(1), 107—120.
Camangian, P. (2010). Starting with self: Teaching autoethnography to foster critically caring literacies. Research in the Teaching of English, 45(2), 179– 204. [Web of Science ®],
Cammarota, J., & Romero, A. (2009). The social justice education project: A critically compassionate intellectualism for Chicana/o students. In W. Ayers, T. Quinn, & D. Stovall (Eds), Handbook for social justice education(pp. 465–476). New York, NY: Routledge.
Carr, M., & Claxton, G. (2002). Tracking the development of learning dispositions. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 9(1), 9–37. doi:10.1080/09695940220119148 [Taylor & Francis Online], [Google Scholar]
Christian Parsons, S., Brown, P. U., & Worley, V. (2004). A metaphor analysis of preserve teachers’ reflective writings about diversity. Curriculum and Teaching Dialogue, 6(1), 49—58.
Delpit, L. (1995/2006). Other people’s children: cultural conflict in the classroom. New York, NY: The New Press.
Satvoldievna, U. D., & Qizi, A. M. N. (2020). Comparative typological analysis of semantic-structural features of conditional inclination in different systematic languages. Проблемы современной науки и образования, (4-2 (149)), 21-23.
Usmonova, D. (2022). PRINCIPLES OF DIVISION OF WORD CATAGORIES IN UZBEK LANGUAGE. YOUTH, SCIENCE, EDUCATION: TOPICAL ISSUES, ACHIEVEMENTS AND INNOVATIONS, 1(2), 60-65.
Usmonova, D. S., & Yusupova, M. I. Q. (2021). Comparative analysis of the somatic phraseological units of the english and russian languages with the component “heart”. Current research journal of philological sciences (2767-3758), 2(11), 94-99.