LINGUOPRAGMATIC ASPECTS OF POLITENESS IN DIFFERENT CULTURES
Main Article Content
Abstract
This text discusses the significance of politeness in human communication and its various linguistic and pragmatic aspects across different cultures. It highlights the role of pragmatics in studying politeness and the different strategies and linguistic features used to convey politeness. The text emphasizes the cultural variability in politeness expression and its importance in facilitating effective cross-cultural communication.
Article Details
References
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press.
Gu, Y. (1990). Politeness phenomena in modern Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics, 14(2), 237-257.
Brown, R., & Gilman, A. (1960). The pronouns of power and solidarity. In T. Sebeok (Ed.), Style in language (pp. 253-276). MIT Press.
Kang, K. (2016). Honorifics and politeness in Korean language. The Handbook of Korean Linguistics, 347-362.
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics (Vol. 3, pp. 41-58). Academic Press.
Watts, R. J. (2003). Politeness (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press.
Watts, R. J. (2003). Politeness (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Usmonova, D. S., & Usmonova, K. E. (2022, October). PHONEME THEORY IN LINGUISTICS SCHOOLS. In INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCES (Vol. 1, No. 13, pp. 6-9).
Ubaydullayeva, Durdona, and Muhammadjon Tojiboyev. "TRANSLATION IS THE STUDY OF LINGUISTIC AND LITERARY." Academic International Conference on Multi-Disciplinary Studies and Education. Vol. 1. No. 1. 2023.
Ismoilova, D. (2021). Pragmatic failure in the heterogeneous