COMPARATIVE THEORIES ON PUNCTUATION MARKS: CONVENTIONS, OPTIONS, OR RULES
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The article deals with the characters that are considered punctuation marks are defined, and described the function they serve within written language. The aim of this study is to highlight the significance of punctuation in English language, conventions, and options. Before, the reader will be given an introduction about the difference between writing and speech and how each depends on the other. This difference is also at the root of the ambiguity about what punctuation marks are and what purpose they serve.
Article Details
References
Ferdinand De Saussure, Grundfragen der Allgemeinen Sprachwissenschaft, (Translation Hermann Lommel. 3rd ed. Berlin: De Gruyter), 2001, p.28.
Geoffrey Nunberg. The Linguistics of Punctuation (Center for the Study of Language), 1990, p. 3.
Leonard Bloomfield. Language: With a New Foreword by C. F. Hockett (Chicago and London: U of Chicago), 1984, p. 21.
M.B. Parkes. Pause and Effect: An Introduction to the History of Punctuation in the West (Berkeley: U of California), 1993 p. 21
O’G’Li, K. K. S., & Ogli, A. M. K. (2022). INGLIZ VA O'ZBEK TILLARIDA OLAM LISONIY MANZARASI VA UNING MAQOLLARDA IFODALANISHING AHAMIYATI. Ta’lim fidoyilari, 2, 15-21.
Kakharova, M. (2023). ASSESSMENT OF THE KNOWLEDGE OF LANGUAGE LEARNERS. International Bulletin of Engineering and Technology, 3(4), 181-184.
Pazilova, Z. (2023). THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS OF STUDYING TRADITIONAL NAMES IN LINGUISTICS. International Bulletin of Engineering and Technology, 3(8), 58-60.
Kakharova, S. (2023). THE IMPORTANCE OF EFFECTIVE TEACHER’S SPEECH IN THE CLASSROOM. Центральноазиатский журнал образования и инноваций, 2(6 Part 6), 173-176.